Also linked to http://www.palmerston-north.info/
All Comments (513)
- BLOODY hysterical if you ask me!
- Who gives a toss about the video, they are talking about saving the planet.
- 1 day ago 10
My jaw has hit the floor. How did the makers of this film ever imagine it would be persuasive to anyone who isn't already convinced?
It's like they hired Bin Laden as a consultant on what would win people over. - 1 day ago 3 I'm sure M.I.A's video for 'Born Free' was banned for using similar effects to these.
The irony is that the former video stood against the segregation that this seems to condone. - I could happily watch the entire planet and everyone on it burn if it meant an end to that sanctimonious little tit, Richard Curtis.
- Pahahaa! Brilliant.
- 1 day ago 8 It's like Battle Royale, but shit and offensive and counterproductive
- To quote Franny Armstrong (Age of Stupid director):
"Because we have got about four years to stabilise global emissions and we are not anywhere near doing that. All our lives are at threat and if that's not worth jumping up and down about, I don't know what is."
"We 'killed' five people to make No Pressure – a mere blip compared to the 300,000 real people who now die each year from climate change," - 1 day ago 3 Comment removed
- 1 day ago 8 What a bloody bloody awful video. Exactly which twerp thought this would not be a huge propoganda coup for the denier?
- @dancedissadent2
deniers? do you still believe that nonsense? really? this video shows how desperate the pro AGW lot are getting. I prefer to be considered a 'realist' btw - @KINELL1234
World experiances its warmest year on record and the antiscience goons are still celebrating victory. Which part of atmospheric radiative transfer physics is wrong my anti science friend? - @dancedissadent2
is name calling the best you can come up with, when will you be moving up to threats of violence? - @dancedissadent2 it's certainly bloody...
- Richard Curtis is a genius.
Step two, desensitise your army with "humour" to make the unacceptable acceptable - Check
Step three, ensure that your army knows they'd better not step out of line - Check
Dave.
I am burning an entire bag of Kingsford charcoal on October 10th. Rain or shine.
If you're gonna make tasteless, shock-jock fascistic propaganda, at least do it well. "Disagree and we'll blow you up! It's funny! We'll even do it to your kids! hahaha!!!!". Goebbels must be spinning in his grave.
This will do nothing for any environmental cause. Nothing. How much money was wasted on his? How much carbon emissions?
so its been taken down.
don't worry, it was stored in people's browser cache.
will come back to haunt ya :)
they relabeled this, i don`t even have a word for this, at least not in english, humanity-fucking probably fit, over the last couple ours several times more. and now, these sissies are trying to pull back and sell this as "tongue-in-mouth-comedy".
we got rid of normal fascism, we are soon to finsih communism, we still have to deal with islamistic dickheads, and now, tada, eco-fascism.
it this world wouldn`t have gorgeous women - suicide!
I mean, okay, the eco-fascists would love to do this, but why did they make this video? Even from their position it doesn't make any sense; it deliberately portrays them as barbarians. What message are we supposed to take from this?
Many viewers "in the middle" will actually be scared into obedience by this film. I am almost scared myself. Only those who have been "resolute independent minds" for quite some time will dare to express their negative feelings.
What this video needs is to be labeled as official distasteful, bullying piece of propaganda - so that people who depend on "official decisions" know that the climate alarmists are "officially" a fascist criminal organization.
What an own-goal !
Lovely bright day here, but thanks to to this odious production I thought I'd turn on all my lights though. All 100 watt incandescent bulbs too, none of your too-dim energy saving shit, either. I've stockpiled them, 95% percent of the energy wasted as heat! That's how I like 'em!
I'll have a carbon footprint like Godzilla by sundown!
This video uses imagery that the young computer game playing kids of today can digest. The enemies of the earth will be fragged to pieces. Brainwashing propaganda by the mentally ill liars for the dumbed down enslaved.
PLEASE don't judge the 10:10 campaign on this video - this video is an ill-thought-out mistake, in my opinion and the opinion of many other 10:10 supporters.
Perhaps you could blow up a doctor as he refrigerates some immunisation jabs or something.
10:10 is a bad joke, Franny Armstrong is just an idiot, and Richard Curtis hasn't had a funny idea in his entire life. Even Blackadder only got worth watching from the second series, after Ben Elton started to co-write.
Did you know 91.3% of statistics are wank. And that repeating the vague assertions of humiliated climatologists hopelessly clinging to their nonsensical unscientific methods and failed theories, is hilariously entertaining.
Exploding people funny? Wow... call the doctor and bring the restraints. I bet you think those suicide bombers must be hilarious.
Sick tactics of fear. Nothing more than media terrorism.
This is not 'funny' or light hearted in any way. The message is loud and clear. Do as we say or we blow you to bits. It is demonisation, fear and hate.
This will be looked at in 50 years in the same light as other hate filled propaganda of the past.
The real cause for the changes we see in the planets climate are twofold, the first is as it has always been, the sun and cosmos. The second is the deployment of geoengineering (HAARP).
Your argument is so strong you feel murder is the only solution for those who disagree? Well done, I hope the bullet holes in your feet fester.
I am on your side of the argument, but I can't help feel that this will only serve to further entrench the deniers. You need some justification for the 'blowing up', perhaps Franny Armstrong:
"We 'killed' five people to make No Pressure – a mere blip compared to the 300,000 real people who now die each year from climate change."
"We 'killed' five people to make No Pressure – a mere blip compared to the 300,000 real people who now die each year from climate change."
The proposed solution... PAY MORE TAXES TO THOSE THAT PROVIDE THE POWER!
lol
Nazi poster for the modern age
Google up
AIM dot org hitlers-green-killing-machine/
AND emerging corruption Nazi-dreams-were-green-dreams/
Google up
AIM dot org hitlers-green-killing-machine/
AND emerging corruption nazi-dreams-were-green-dreams/
MEDIA TERRORISM
No-one wants to remove ALL the CO2 from the atmosphere (as we'd all die). We need to get the amount down to a safe level though, so that runaway warming can't happen - this is simple risk-management.
1999-2009 was the hottest decade on record. And 2010 is already said to be one of the warmest years ever. How is that not warming?
try this
thinking for your self
But what a response below, such hysteria. For the energy oligarchs like those of us who are clean from hot water and are currently staring at a screen in a heated building, this video is a timely reminder that we need to change our ways in order to preserve living conditions on earth. We can go green simply by reducing our consumption. When you start to value more than 'prosperity', you're life is healthier, better and more fun (-:
The royal society
I think you got that the wrong way round friend.
I dont friend
And now, all of a sudden, it's OK to fantasize about dealing gruesome deaths to people who don't support the 10:10 initiative?
I'm saving this video on my hard drive. I want the shame of this to remain, even if you delete it from Youtube.
This video is MEDIA TERRORISM
The has a series of characters that are using fear and terror to enforce the lie of warming (warming is the argument not 'climate change', 'change' includes cooling).
The charachters kill by explosion those that are not pro-climate change. Those that are undecided are killed. Those that are agnostic are killed. Those that are against are killed.
REMIX THIS VIDEO FOR OTHER ISSUES (pro-settlements?). This would highlight how sick it really is.
Wake up suckers - While you fanny about with Co2 the real pollution goes un-challenged.
You think you're tough? Bring it on, fascists, bring it on.
This video is MEDIA TERRORISM.
The has a series of characters that are using fear and terror to enforce the lie of warming (warming is the argument not 'climate change', 'change' includes cooling).
The charachters kill by explosion those that are not pro-climate change. Those that are undecided are killed. Those that are agnostic are killed. Those that are against are killed.
REMIX THIS VIDEO FOR OTHER ISSUES (pro-settlements?). This would highlight how sick it really is.
Sickening....
One good thing, if the eco-mentalists have to resort to these kind of tactics then it means they are losing the argument.
(and if you conform, you'll die another way. Trust us, we're the Left and we wanna rule you, dead or alive!)
Fascists.
This coming from someone who agrees in principle, but feels ever more alienated by dogmatic, and now, fascist, arseholes like you.
Fascists.
This coming from someone who agrees in principle, but feels ever more alienated by dogmatic, and now, fascist, arseholes like you.
Well not for these climate nazis. They have "the truth" and you're either with them or against them. Using the same tactics of GW's "war on terror". Don't even consider standing against them, because you'll promptly be labeled as a "terrorist". How's that for a totalitarian approach?
Is that your REAL message? That we should all die?
But right now I want to drive several hundred miles in an SUV to get myself a huge polar bear steak and then eat it outside in the middle of winter with my patio heater on maximum. Just to send a great big "f*ck you" to the people who made this video.
@The1010Campaign I think you need to catch up on current affairs
Co2 is NOT a pollutant
The planet has not significantly warmed
Here is a thought for you
what would happen to all living things if you removed all Co2 from the atmosphere?
no one wants to remove all co2.. a) this is silly b) it is completely impossible anyway.
if you would at least pay some attention on current affairs, you would have noticed that the issue is to REDUCE co2 emissions as much as it's possible, as it contributes significantly to the warming of the planet, which leads to crazy weather and increased amount of natural disasters.
This is what the game is all about, not the complete removal of co2.
What a doughnut. “Co2 is not a pollutant”! You need to start learning from a school that isn’t run by Exxon. Try breathing pure co2 for a while and then say its not a pollutant.
Tell that to a tree retard, in case you hadn't noticed humans aren't the only species on this planet.
You'd have to read his comment, he was trying to claim that CO2 is toxic.
It’s a dumb argument to say co2 isn’t a pollutant. It’s an argument propagated by Exxon and other companies tied to earning profits from the burning of the planet, you should look into it. If 7 billion people are burning fossil fuels, guess what? It gives of pollutants. CO2 being one of them. To argue plants like co2, so keep burning fossil fuels is dumb and short sighted.
The argument that co2 is not a pollutant is a dumb argument propagated by the greed of Exxon and other oil companies, because they are stuck and addicted to burning dirty fossil fuels.
My understanding of a pollutant is something that causes harm to the environment. Plants grow larger and faster in atmospheres of higher CO2. Some animals eat those plants, humans eat plants and other animals. Sounds like a healthy eco-system to me. Why try and change it?
If you breathe pure co2 you will die.
If you breathe pure water you will die.
If you breathe pure oxygen you will die.
It is not about co2 be ing a poison. co2 can not and will not reach 1/100th the levels required for that to happen. You make no sense. You are damaging the pro-climate change movement by saying such things so please continue.
Exxon paid for the study co2 is life to encourage consumers to carry on burning and stop caring about the consequences. Co2 is a greenhouse gas and needs addressing.
That energy company profits argument is wank, they pass all their losses on to the consumer. I wonder if you can comprehend the potential profits that carbon trading will earn for these companies?
Your concept of a pollutant is redundant, sure I could take up your challenge and breath pure CO2 for a while, but i could also kill myself breathing pure oxygen or nitrogen or any other natural gas in our atmosphere.
I'm all for clean energy: hemp fuel, nuclear, zero point lol; plus some wave harnessing machines are efficient enough to be considered viable. I just have an aversion to propaganda and shoddy science, especially when followed by a dangerous oppressive political agenda.
Pure Evil.
Have I got the right message here?
It’s a pleasure to see that Jihad’s Shahid style explosions are a more than acceptable funny joke, from the ecologistic point of view… the important is to kill only the infidels of the ecoreligion instead of the infidels of the islamic religion.
Ecologism has to be violent, finally the mask is falling. We only have to hope that idiots don’t try to do what other idiots joke about.
what a piece of filth, hatred and lies. Death to the NWO.
disgusting!
Have I got the right message?
Isn't it weird how all leftist utopias wind up the same way?
Its no accident that they all end up being run by murderous dictators, the socialist/communist agenda requires it
Well that was rather stupid of you!
Just goes to show there's twats on both sides of the fence, who clearly can't think properly.
Of course, given I don't believe you committed your metaphorical act, then it doesn't matter really.
Ecologism has to be violent, finally the mask is falling. We only have to hope that idiots don't try to do what other idiots joke about.
I wonder if we could reverse the controls...
This is pretty off. Clearly there is a team of people fighting these down and censoring. Just accept free speech guys.... don't be control freaks.
Personally I'm a life scientist wo believes we are damaging the planet badly... but this video is ethically wrong on many levels.
I guess the school bullies who grew up into office bullies and caused the mess we are in are still in charge. I guess the morons are still running the show.
I find it repulsive and it's insulting towards all the people who have made sacrifices over many years to make people aware of their responsibilities to their environment.
It's not about bullying and lying. You won't make a difference that way.
A third of the 20 worst-performing Japanese funds this year are green funds, with returns down a fifth or more for several of them, according to data from Lipper Inc. By comparison, the broad TOPIX index has lost just 8.6 percent.
Yes. What design are you planning on getting?
I think the barcode one will be popular.....!
fuck u commi scum the only thing that's going to die is your AGW SCAM
yellow patches coming next to mark out those for the red button treatment.
Practise what you preach please.
I'm all for the continued development of electric cars, solar power, etc. But the refusal of so many environmental groups to support nuclear power (which is our best hope of reducing carbon emissions in the short to mid term) has completely turned me off them.
What a load of tosh. Nuclear energy is not an answer to climate change or any other destruction we humans are causing to the planet. It’s dirty, expensive, polluting and definitely not renewable. It’s not about follow us, or them. We all share the same earth and the same future.
I suppose you think wind turbines are the future eh?
The problem is that it's a bogus product that a lot of people want to sell, but no one wants to buy.
You bet he is wrong. Stern and Kyoto want to cut world economic growth by a third to a half. This will result in the premature death of millions worldwide each and every year. It would be an inconvenience to those in the first world (esp. those who are jobless as a result), but it would be a grim reaper in the rest of the world.
Humongous harm done.
wow...there you have it, the admission.
Yes. But beware, the experience may just knock your eyeballs out of their sockets. (To me it was no news, of course. I was astounded only by the fact hat they actually had the absolute face to come out and say what they said!)
Having said that, I believe CO2 AGW is real. But greatly exaggerated, and no threat whatever.
Thank you Gillian! You are so brave! Love U.
It is actually quite a scandal. I'm surprised no one seems to have heard of this.
When was Gillian's last payday?
Crouch needs to buy Abby some new jewellery and/or pay for another hooker.
Ginola is no longer advertising L'Oreal.
The kids probably thought it was a laugh, so were happy with their hyperactivity-inducing treats they were given.
Anyway she has filmed/is filming a movie and several mini-series for BBC and I'm sure they pay her...
thank you!
switched all the lights on in the house and left the hot tap running.
Sounds like you could have a new format for the TV show Deal or No Deal.
well done to the makers.
Richard curtis just gave us carte blanche to do it.
watch out teacher , i hate your voice.
Actually, the EPA puts it at c. 7 Billion Metric Tons Carbon. Of this total, c. 4 BMTC is absorbed by the ocean sink (38,000 BMTC), and soil sink (c. 2000 BMTC). The rest accumulates in the atmospheric sink (700 BMTC) resulting in an increase of c. 0.4% per year at present rates. Currently we are at CO2 390 ppm. (0.039% of atmosphere).
Effect is c. +1C per doubling, but to be reduced by negative feedbacks. A minor effect.
There is only a threat if there are positive feedback loops. There is no scientific consensus at all on positive feedback. Recent findings show only negative feedbacks in evidence, and no positive feedback whatever. (This will reduce the warming effects of CO2 by around half.)
nonsense, show us the proof,
LOL.....there's that infamous word yet again being trotted out.
In science, there is no such thing as CONSENSUS!
Empirical evidence/data is what's required, and none of that tallies with what the computer models predict either going forward, or by regression.
In other words, GIGO - garbage in = garbage out.
I suppose the IPCC's use of a mountain guide's comments, and getting 2350 mixed up with 2035 is just a simple little mistake?
mainly because i find your voice so painfully irritating.
'miss i am going to leave my dads car running, take the longest flight i can and pour petrol down the drain'
a real piece of junk even for the watermellon crowd, there again intelligent thinking was never their forte!!
Reported as inappropriate under "hate speech" for good measure.
If some people are not convinced by your beliefs... it's ok to blow them up. Err.. so does that work ok for religious beliefs? We wouldn't really want people going around with bombs in their rucksacks would we?
OMG .... We have them already??
Richard Curtis - if this really is anything to do with you, you need to think really hard about what you've just done. And come up with something which undoes the harm you've just caused.
Or maybe I just don't get it. Actually I do.
'how many of you children find my voice irritating'
agree with us or we will kill you.
Nasa earth observatory- last 30 years show the northern hemisphere has been greening due it increase of Co2
add co2 don't take it away!!
It might just strike a chord if the judge is a Eco Freak...Mmm?
If this ain't a p*sstake of the loony left we are in trouble.
1) There are global issues associated with air, food&water, forestation, wildlife, disaster planning/amelioration that need to be taken care of - esp with a booming global population.
2) This "no pressure" video is fuck-off retarded. Pushing red buttons on children who disagree with you? Fuck you... and I'm an environmentalist.
No, we account for c. 3% of it and about 40% of that accumulates (the rest is absorbed by natural sinks).
So, yes, the 1/3 buildup is from man. But so what? It has very little effect except to increase biomass, both plant and animal (esp, in the rain forests). Some effect on temperatures, but not much. Overall, manmade CO2 probably does more good for the environment than harm.
It does however bring together "deniers" and "believers", since both groups agree it is an own goal.
The warmists don't really want to blow my kids up.; they'd just like to make sure that we all ended up living back in the dark ages.
Nutters.
A. Stupid.
or:
B. The proud owner of a Sports Utility Vehicle.
Road To Serfdom.
That's the psychology of terrorism.
I'm sure this video will NOT raise a laugh in Omagh. The school scene with blood-spattered faces will NOT go down well in Dunblane.
It this is an attempt at humour, it has gone sadly and badly wrong. I have flagged it as "disgusting" and hope it will be removed without delay.
I suggest people flag this video, no one in their right mind would find exploding children in such a graphic manner appropriate for this site or any other.
Less than 50 years ago people like the ones who made this video were treated with pre-frontal lobotomies and electroconvulsive therapy. Watch out climatards, you are really making a good case for those things to come back.
Eco-fucktards enjoy your last days of power, you have officially jumped the shark.
Humans account for 0.2 percent of the carbon output.Fact. Besides that, global warming is just a natural process.
There is a beautiful prediction of the pattern of warming we should expect to see in the atmosphere if the catastrophe theory has any merit.
But the predicted tropical hot spot is nowhere to be seeen. Past warming cannot be due to the purported climate mechanisms. Without observation, the scientific method says the hypothesis is falsified.
A less effective one that you must be on.
Go on then, Dr Hegemoner, explain to us all how we've tipped the planet into runaway-cataclysmic mode.
Now before you do, please reference how we achieved the Little Ice Age a few hundred years ago, and how Venus-like the planet was when CO2 was 10x higher in concentration a fair few million years ago.
Can't wait to learn how 400 ppm now is different from 4000 ppm back then.
You claim to be qualified and that's all you can come up with. I didn't attack you with ad-homs.
IPCC AR4 Figs 9.1(c) and 9.1(f) set out a picture of the warming pattern we should expect to see if human CO2 radiative forcing is a genuine phenomenon. Including the so-called "tropospheric hot spot".
We don't see the pattern - even though recent warming is claimed to be due to those processes. Go figure.
Hey Mr science doctor dude, how many humans do you want to exterminate to save the planet? You know humans exhale CO2, right Mr internet science doctor? How many dead humans would it take to decrease the amount of green house gasses we release from our bodies?
0.44 CO2 levels vs. Temperature.
0.85 Pacific PDO + Atlantic AMO Ocean.
0.88 Linear + Cyclic Null Hypothesis v.s. Temp.
0.96 Pacific PDO + Atlantic AMO Ocean + Solar Activity.
Conculsions:
(1) No chanage in temperatures since CO2 increases of the last 50 years as 130 yr tend remains unchanged based upon observational data.
(2) Natural causes, PDO+AMO+Solar, clearly shown.
(3) Based upon observed data Nature falsifies alarmist AGW hypothesis.
Who flagged this as SPAM?
If you don't understand, ask for an explanation or use Google, and read it for yourself.
Yes, I think CO2 has a small influence (maybe a +1C/century per doubling -- or less, given negative feedback). But it appears to be spit in the ocean compared with natural variation.
This video is arrogant in its certainty and appalling in its delivery. And unfunny.
It makes no sense. And since it makes no sense in that interpretation the obvious real interpretation is that its good to kill people who don't believe in global warming.
So this is intentionally inspiring murder.
True. mild cooling.
"And have you even heard of Climategate?"
I had the intense pleasure to be luxuriantly wallowing in it a full day before CRU hit the fan.
"Seriously, the jig is up. It's a fraud"
I doubt it's a complete fraud. But it does appear to have been very greatly exaggerated. And the positive feedback loop ("tipping point") flap now appears to be in scientific tatters.
I suppose that would be ok as long as the people doing the talking had british accents (thus it would obviously just be dark british humor).
First, I do not concede that there are "consequences". Mild warming such as we have had in the last century has been highly beneficial.
Second, continuing development in the first world is essential to development (and progression to a postindustrial society) of the third.
this is the biggest sham ever foisted upon the weak minded. I'm all for environmentalism but this AGW business is just whacko. methinks there is something else at play behind the scenes..........
AGW is a hoax. The Earth and the Sun have natural cycles that drive the planet's climate. The Sun is putting out more radiation which - shocker - heats up the Earth as it is receiving more solar energy. I am thankful that my climatology professors stuck to their guns and didn't spew this pathetic AGW drivel.
Give it your best shot assh le.. after watching this video I've decided to increase my CO2 emissions by at least 30% over the next year.
USHCN raw data shows +0.14C/century warming per climate station. USHCN1 "modified" data clocks in at +0.59C/century. (USHCN2 is worse.)
"You're talking about limiting development when population needs it? Who exactly are you talking about?"
[Satggering in shock] Um, the entire third and fourth worlds? Three quarters of humanity? I beg you to consider this!
Because the " "development" " that needs limiting is specially coming from first world countries. They're the main contributors. And the unfair thing is that third world countries will suffer the consequences first.
And unlike in the little eco-terrorism delusion of this waste of video, I won't just blow up because some environazi pushes a button as credible as the apocalyptic clap trap AGW believers cling to.
Two words from a wattsbot moderator: Negative Feedback.
Cue that.
What an absurd and patently false statement!
The threat from allowing people who think like this -- these people are religious nuts telling us what they really think about what we should do with heretics, although they will deny it to their dying breath -- is far, FAR greater than anything global warming, or climate change, or climate interruption or whatever name it has this week -- could ever present
Do you recall just a short while ago, IPCC chairman Pachauri said he wished skeptics would apply asbestos to their faces every day? And now, after the many IPCC scandals and people calling for him to step down, he says the IPCC welcomes a vigorous and healthy debate with skeptics. Completely unrelated, of course, is Pachauri's business ties that will make him a wealthy man upon worldwide global warming legislation.
No big news: ADOLF HITLER and his NATIONAL SOCIALISM theory did the same 70 years ago.
No big news: ADOLF HITLER and his NATIONAL SOCIALISM theory did the same 70 years ago.
SILVER SPRING, Md. — A man who railed against the Discovery Channel’s environmental programming for years burst into the company’s headquarters with at least one explosive device strapped to his body Wednesday and took three people hostage at gunpoint before police shot him to death, officials said.”
This video is Terrorism.
Sep 1, 2010
SILVER SPRING, Md. — A man who railed against the Discovery Channel's environmental programming for years burst into the company's headquarters with at least one explosive device strapped to his body Wednesday and took three people hostage at gunpoint before police shot him to death, officials said.
Yes it's a eugenics movement, look at some of the big players, Paul Ehrlich, John Holdren etc..
Dave.
It all starts with terms like "denier"
Damn it. there're reasons we have a Second Amendment in America.
Crap like this? Way high on the list.
And, see, I know the statists are going to point at me in horror, threatening their earth-loving peaceable selves with, with GUNS! How Barbaric!
Ignoring the threat that's just been leveled at we dissenters.
Appalling.
Dave.
You eco-crowd have gone off your fucking heads, do you know that?
Anybody who asks me if I'll be voluntary cutting my carbon emissions by 10% will immediately have to be neutralized. I think there are too many eco-loons who will get exactly the intended message - kill the skeptics. Really whoever made and posted this should be prosecuted as promoting violence.
Anybody who asks me if I'll be voluntary cutting my carbon emissions by 10% will immediately have to be neutralized. I think there are too many eco-loons who will get exactly the intended message - kill the skeptics. Really this should be prosecuted as promoting violence.
Do we? What right now? Can't it wait another 5 minutes?
I won't be investing in cutting Carbon emissions, so am oot!
Now Beans, aside from Gi standing for Greatly Ignorant, tell us all just exactly what the urgent issue is, and how anything related to reducing plant food will be of benefit to us.
We're all ears, so wow and dazzle us with your intricate knowledge of all things AGW (that's anthropogenic global wombling.....sorry, warming) - we can't wait to hear what you have to say.
Yes, I am ignorant to many things concerning GW, I am not claiming to know it all. I just can't believe there are so many people in denial of its existence. Even with all the scientific evidence and studies. And climate change itself. It's so obvious that we don't need science to tell us somethings wrong.
Are you saying that you really don't know the details, but because you've read that there are lots of studies that say it's true, it must be true?
I was at that point a few years ago, until I researched to find out how bad it might get, and read the studies. The case for catastrophic AGW is so thin and exaggerated, no wonder they have to go for commercials like this to sell it.
And unless you have dedicated your professional life to studying GW, you can't claim to know *everything* there's it to know about it either.
But I do think that if the unquestionable majority of scientists believe in those studies, they have a reason for it. And so do other people to believe them.
And I also think it's a very comfortable position to negate the findings and pretend that nothing's happening.
Wow--chill my friend, and re-read my message--I *asked* "Are you saying that...?"--how can that be intentionally misquoting you?
>"the unquestionable majority of scientists believe in those studies"
Which "those studies"? How on Earth do you know it's the majority of scientists, much less the "unquestionable majority"?
Whether it's the farce "2,500 scientists" the IPCC claims, etc... maybe you should question just a few things--it's healthy.
Yeah it is. Thanks, I will.
There are "findings" that show that current temperatures are not unusual over even the past 1000 years.
"The findings" show that Glacier National Park's glaciers have receded to an alarming degree over the past century. "The findings" also reveal they started their rapid loss in the mid 1800's, and that they lost most of their mass in the early part of the 20th century--not the latter part.
There are many "findings"--I'd be happy to debate this in any public forum.
How is climate change (AGW) so obvious? Give me some examples.
but bringing up the bible, seriously? Please let's don't bring religion into this. Isn't this tediously polemic enough as it is?
As I said 20 min ago, I'm going to bed.
"No it's not." Albert Einstein.
"The science behind relativity is settled." Albert Einstein.
"No it's not." Paul Dirac.
It's piss-poor science, considering that the Earth has had 20 X the CO2 with COOLER TEMPERATURES, and that, based on a billion year average, we're currently 10C BELOW average, and coming out of a glacial stage.
It's getting warmer? No shit. In other news, the sky is blue.
in the 1970's everyone thought we were slowly freezing to death, and that the world was already 'overpopulated'
we were already supposed to have exhausted the worlds oil supply 20+ years ago
pollution of the lakes, rivers, and even the oceans was so catastophic that eating fish was unimaginable. plankton dead, thus whales would die out, with the rest of the food chain
and yet we go on... and on... and on...
Sorry, what's wrong exactly?
Surely you're not alluding to the recent monsoon flood being a direct result of AGW?
If you accept the Little Ice Age did happen, then all that's happened is the planet has naturally been coming out of it.
CO2 is not, yes that's NOT, a good insulator.
It is an easily measurable and identifiable gas, which the vested-interest groups can use to extract money from governments for on-going research, who in turn have an easy way to increase taxes in turn.
get a grip and give yourself a slap soft southern puff. it's a film Jesus
The few non-sceptics will see what these bastards are really about & I mean the VERY few after they heard the way Algore was indoctrinating kids.
Dave.
Was that the effect you were going for?
I would say probably the bit that disregards little things like those little understood clouds, convection, humidity as regards the measurement of Earth energy, you know, just minor stuff!
Dave.
Except they arent, only the liar bloggers claim they are. Still fed lies repeat lies, monkey see monkey do. Cue 'but they cant model clouds' whine the wattsbots are so proud off.
Dave.
Nonsense, the planet is not in any way, shape, or form, at a tipping point!
You who hang onto the coat-tails of the vested interest groups and individuals are akin to the Pied Piper and the rats following him.
Go do some research, and you'll soon see the crap fed into the modelling computers doesn't tally with the data being recorded by the genuine honest scientists, ignored by the IPCC because they're not toeing the propaganda line.
Just as Chicken Licken found, the sky isn't falling!
Or the 1M+ that die of malaria, or the millions that die because they don't have potable water or electricity or because of despotic regimes and countless other causes.
Tell them that a fictional 300,000 are dying of climate change!
Dave.
What's the correlation?
Dave.
Check out the maths fool, around 0.21 to 0.17 depending on the data tracked (itself already bastardised and murdered to suit desired 'findings') = a low correlation.
Certainly not one strong enough to rush backwards and limit development at a time when most of the population urgently need it.
Who's to say those numbers are not modified to suit *your* argument?
You're talking about limiting development when population needs it? Who exactly are you talking about? I think before convenience and commodity, people need water, food supply, healthy environment, livable areas that are not affected by constant storms and floods... you know, the basics. That's what's threatened by GW.
The storms and floods, etc are the propagandists tools - sell doom and gloom, offer hope and salvation......for the right price of course!
Cynical - you bloody well should be, instead of swallowing everything they feed you.
Spend some time, or a lot, and do some investigating - then, and only then, will you be able to say you've made your own mind up, rather than having it made up for you.
Seriously, do it.
Why's everyone so worked up about this? - Its just saying people who don't care about climate change are essentially killing themselves, its done in this way to be attention grabbing and done in a HUMOROUS way. What i don't like about climate change preachers is that they are usually massive hypocrites (Al Gore as a very good example)!!! x
Richard Curtis is a cunt.
Unfortunately it's as bad as Curtis' recent films. Pitiful. And just a little alarmist no? Ah, well business as usual then.
i'm going to go out of my way now to UP my carbon foot print after watching that pile of complete and utter garbage!
is name calling the best you can come up with, when will you be moving up to threats of violence?
Stop cwying ickle child. I asked what part of the science was wrong, you offered none. Vaccuous posts do not get polite messages.
Science, such an abused term. Good at abuse aren't you. What possible connection with science can you offer for this lamentable ad?
Dave.